Posted on: March 12, 2010 2:07 pm

Are the Vikes and Pack FAR better than Bears?

I certainly believe that the improvements that the Packers and Vikings need to make are far less than the Chicago Bears needed to make at the beginning of FA...

... However, I think with the addition of Mike Martz at offensive coordinator, Julius Peppers on the defensive line, Chester Taylor as a combo back with Forte, and a blocking TE (which was SEVERELY missing in 3rd-and-short situations; for you fans who thought John Gilmore was an afterthought a couple years ago-- think again!) I think the Bears have closed the gap quite significantly with the draft and OTA cuts still left in the offseason.

I think the biggest obstacle for the Chicago Bears last year was the 1.) offensive gameplan (R. Turner's deficiencies) 2.) weak pass defense and 3.) the offensive line.

The offensive line corrected itself with the "addition by subtraction method" as Orlando Pace just didn't have the juice that many was anticipating.  i thought that he might have one year in him and that he would probably be a roster cut in 2010, but he was horrible last year and STILL was a roster cut in 2010.  I liked the idea of Pace being brought in, but I wanted him to have a young backup that he could give instruction to throughout practice.  Frank Omiyale and Chris Williams might have been those tackles taking instruction all along and perhaps that was managements idea all along.  Nevertheless, I think the line came together better when Williams was moved to the LT and Schaffer was on the right.  As I said early in the offseason, I expect Omiyale to be the RT and Chris Williams start the OTAs as the starting LT for the team.  The Bears will need a solid left OG in 2010 as I'm certain that Beekman is not the man for that position.  Ideally, I think the Bears see him as Olin Kruetz's replacement and I think he will start getting reps at Center in this year's OTAs.  If not, I think we have to question "what is Beekman's place" as I asked in 2009.

Also, there are still some good veteran FAs available at the guard position.  Football Outsiders ranked Bobbie Williams as one of the highest rated guards in the NFL last year with the Bengals in pass and rush protection.  He has never missed a game due to a football injury in his time in the NFL and is around 32 or 33 years old (not exactly sure).  Is he the long term solution at the position?  No, but neither was John Tait, Rueben Brown, or Fred Miller.  What happened with thos e additions was that ANgelo was suppose to work on finding their replacement and mentee over the course of the next one-to-two years as he stated at their press conferences in 2004 and 2005, but Angelo focused more of his attention to the defense and the offense got worse as the o-line aged.  Williams could come in and be serviceable this season and the Bears could then look for a guard or two in 2011, which might make sense since Roberto Garza (who a lot of fans underrate, but consistently is high among statisticians assessment of NFL guards production) will be near 32 and need a mentee/backup.

Offensive gameplan was totally rearranged with the hire of Mike Martz and an injection of a completely new offense.  Martz's offense is complex, but if executed properly can be quite successful as seen in St. Louis and in Detroit with Jon Kitna.  What concerns me is the number of 7-step drops in the system and the WRs needing to recgnize the coverage and get open.  I think Jay Cutler is a good QB who moves well in the pocket and avoids taking hits, but that is contingent upon getting steady play from the OL as we seen at the end of last year.  I think he will get that next year and the run game should improve with Chester Taylor, who will drive Forte to get better and get in shape (which some experts say was the cause of his lack of production in 2009).  A left guard is necessary for that transition, but I think its feasible for the offense to gel fairly quickly.  Here's a question though: "How will a HIGH passing offense produce in Chicago December and January?"

That leaves just the defensive secondary and that has been my major concern the past three years as I just see the secondary (from a personnel perspective) being the major concern for lack of defensive ineptitude rather than any other area on the field.  The loss of Brian Urlacher early on in the year CERTAINLY contributed to poor play and lack of motivation as well.  Combine that with the loss of another on-the-field emotional leader in safety Mike Brown and its easy to say that the Bears of 2009 were a totally different team from a emotional and skill standpoint as Urlacher and Brown were the smartest players on that defense.  Charles Tillman and Lance Briggs have always been the most athletic and aggressive players on the defense, but-- in the case of Tillman-- he has NEVER been a great cover guy but used intimidation and his aggressive tackling to make receivers "blink" at the thought of catching the ball in front of him.  His shoulders are seeming to be giving out on him as Jerry Azumah's did 7-8 years ago and it seems as though he doesn't have much football in him.  Briggs is a great football player, but doesn't have the on-field leadership that Brian Urlacher has.  Briggs will give you 100 tackles each year, but he just doesn't make anyone else on the team better.  Doesn't make him any less of player (still one of the top linebackers in the NFL), just not a great leader for a defense.

One of my first threads this offseason was listing that the Bears needs should start in the secondary-- in particular; the safety position.  Over the course of the past 6 years when you look at the impact of Mike Brown on this football team it shows time and time again that in a C2/T2 system, having great safety play makes it easier on the CBs on either side of the field.  Charles Tillman is a poor coverage defender, but in the games that Mike Brown was backing him up, he was able to keep things in front of him and KNOW-that-he-KNOWS that a intelligent and athletic Mike Brown had his back.  2004-2006 were some of Tillman's best years and its not easy to see that a smart, healthy, and young FS in the backfield made the game easier for him.

Good safeties are needed in a C2 and I hope that this is now clear to the Bears manageent.

I believe they will reconcentrate on the position via draft if they can't get a quality one in FA for a good price.  Many speak of Atogwe and I think that's a valid request, but at the 6-7 million that he wants per year, that might be unreasonable for the quality of defender he is.  Troy Polamalu is by FAR the best FS in the NFL.  His contract?

7/23/2007: Signed a five-year, $33 million contract. The deal contains $15.375 million guaranteed, including a $10.975 million signing bonus. 2009: $2.9 million, 2010: $6.1 million, 2011: $6.4 million, 2012: Free AgentAtogwe is not at that level given that Polamalu plays for that much now and has not renegotiated his contract again, nor has a safety been drafted in a spot where the bar for a player with his [Polamalu] potential can be thought to garner that type of money.  USC's Mays might get there this year, but that has yet to be determined as he would need to crack the top 8 or 9 draft picks to get the money that Polamlu receives now (signing and roster bonuses not included).

Atogwe will be available after the draft, but the demand will certainly go up as teams will have to address needs BEFORE camp.  Can the Bears move before other teams and is this a place that Atogwe would want to play in?  That remains to be determined.

Two things are certain about the safety position: 1.) the Bears need to adress it with a quality long-term solution and 2.) they are NOT going to pay any of the safeties currently on the market 6-7 million dollars.
Posted on: February 19, 2008 2:52 pm

G Jason Brown a Bear?

I've always liked the Baltimore Ravens run game.  They are one of the teams I use in Madden '08 when I just want to BURY someone on the GROUND.

I read on sportsline.com that Jason Brown of the Ravens is an restricted free agent, who should garner a second round pick from any team interested.

I haven't watched many of their games, but I DO remember seeing a game in Week 11 against the Patriots where he literally MANHANDLED Richard Seymour for the most part of the game.  He's an agressive-type blocker who excels at ground and pound type schemes.  He's only in his 4th year and has played only two-seasons next to FUTURE HOF-er Johnathan Ogden.

I would like to see him placed in the gap next to Olin Kruetz and (hopefully) Alan Faneca giving us an OUTSTANDING left-side of the ball attack.

Category: NFL
Posted on: February 17, 2008 7:38 pm

Alan Faneca just makes sense, folks...

While many of us feel that the Alan Faneca deal just "makes sense,"  there seems to be many of us who feel that it would be too high a cost and might not be the end all solution to our O-line woes.  I saw this report on Yahoo.com about the 7-time Pro-Bowler and thought it was quite interesting.  The writer questions the Bears "QUESTIONING" if they need Faneca or not!?

It read:

My question is, how long did they need to study to realize Faneca is an absolute stud up front who can significantly upgrade their shoddy line play from last season? What, seven Pro Bowls, a consistently powerful Steelers running game and a Super Bowl ring weren't enough proof that Faneca, still only 31, is 6-5, 312 pounds of interior blocking fury? The only thing Chicago should be researching is if it has the funds and salary-cap means to sign Faneca to a multi-year deal.

I have been an ADAMENT and EARLY supporter of this acquisition with the idea that we get rid of some of the AGING lineman as well as some of the 2nd tier players on the line who have either peaked or show NO potential.  Bringing Faneca in and moving Tait back to right along with a pick-up on the FIRST day of the draft would be huge for the O-line.  If Beekman bans out as many scouts said he would, I think we would have an O-line that would be UP TO SPEED with our defense (barring injury).
Category: NFL
Posted on: February 13, 2008 12:14 am

2007 Bears Passing Offense numbers: Interesting?

The title of this web story is "Potent Passing Attack"

...and its about the 2007 Chicago Bears!?

But after reading the article, there is an argument there.  Here's an excerpt from it:

Bears quarterbacks Brian Griese, Rex Grossman and Kyle Orton combined to throw for 3,701 gross passing yards and 3,362 net yards in 2007, the third highest totals in both categories in franchise history.

Four of the Bears' six highest net passing totals have come during Ron Turner's two stints as offensive coordinator (1993-96; 2005-07). The Bears set team passing records in 1999 with 4,352 gross yards and 4,136 net yards.

Brian Griese led the Bears in all passing categories in 2007 with 1,803 yards, 10 touchdowns and a 75.6 passer rating.
From Week 4 through the rest of the season, the Bears produced 25 completions of at least 25 yards, which tied for third most in the NFL behind only New England (31) and Green Bay (30).

Eight different receivers hauled in 25-plus-yard catches during that span. Griese led the team with 13 such pass plays during that stretch, while Grossman registered nine (10 total) and Orton had three.

There has been a lot said about Brian Griese and how he was ineffective, but I don't think he stood a chance in the offensive playcall.  Griese and his 30+- year old arm was asked to throw the ball 30+ times a game with a season high of 45+ in the game versus the Lions.  I never understood why they abandoned the run after they sat Grossman down.  Speaking of Rex Grossman, he was doomed to fail as well.  I still believe that he needed one season to sit and learn behind a capable veteran for a year.  The Bears should have let Griese play 2006 season, and allowed Grossman to watch and FORCED him to work on his mechanics and "read & recognition" skills. I digress though... These numbers are something though...
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com